Advanced Search
ZHANG Wangling, ZHAO Lianjun, REN Yu, ZOU Zhengyun. Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Malignant Melanoma Liver Metastasis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2025, 52(8): 666-675. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.25.0018
Citation: ZHANG Wangling, ZHAO Lianjun, REN Yu, ZOU Zhengyun. Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Malignant Melanoma Liver Metastasis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2025, 52(8): 666-675. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.25.0018

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Malignant Melanoma Liver Metastasis

  • Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with malignant melanoma liver metastasis.
    Methods The clinical data of patients with melanoma liver metastasis before first-line systemic therapy were retrospectively collected. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the association of clinical characteristics with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors associated with PFS and OS were determined through Cox regression analysis.
    Results A total of 80 patients were included in this study. Six of these patients did not receive systemic or local antitumor therapy after the diagnosis of liver metastasis. Their median survival time after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 2.3 months. The median OS of the remaining 74 patients was 12.83 months. Cox regression analysis determined that in the patients receiving systemic or local antitumor therapy, age and local treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS; gender and serum NSE levels were independent prognostic factors for systemic PFS and intrahepatic PFS. First-line treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may have survival benefits for patients but the difference was not statistically significant (HR=0.716, P=0.255). Among gene mutations, NRAS mutations had the highest rates (11.25%) and were associated with poor prognosis. In addition, BRAF and CKIT mutations were detected in eight (10%) and four (5%) patients, respectively.
    Conclusion Patients who are younger and receive local treatment have a relatively better prognosis. The first-line ICI therapy may have survival benefits for patients.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return