Advanced Search
WEI Ling, WANG Fengzhe, YIN Guoliang, PAN Shinong. Diagnostic Value of PDFF and OP/IP for Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(2): 115-118. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.0906
Citation: WEI Ling, WANG Fengzhe, YIN Guoliang, PAN Shinong. Diagnostic Value of PDFF and OP/IP for Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(2): 115-118. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.0906

Diagnostic Value of PDFF and OP/IP for Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    PAN Shinong, E-mail: cjr.panshinong@vip.163.com

  • Received Date: July 14, 2019
  • Revised Date: October 09, 2019
  • Available Online: January 12, 2024
  • Objective 

    To investigate the diagnostic value of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and in phase and out of phase imaging (OP/IP) for thoracic and lumbar multiple myeloma bone disease (MMBD).

    Methods 

    All patients underwent spinal MRI, including sagittal T1WI, sagittal STIR, sagittal mDxion quant and sagittal mDxion FFE. The normal vertebrae and benign lesion vertebrae were non-MMBD lesion group, and the MMBD lesion vertebrae was MMBD lesion group, and the PDFF and OP/IP value were measured respectively. Two independent sample t-tests were performed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the two parameters for MMBD; the Pearson test was used to analyze the correlation between the two parameters. The diagnostic cutoff value of OP/IP and PDFF were calculated by Youden index method.

    Results 

    The PDFF of the MMBD lesion group was lower while the OP/IP was higher than those of the non-MMBD lesion group (both P < 0.05). The diagnostic cutoff values, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), the sensitivity, the specificity of PDFF and OP/IP were 8.45% and 0.66, 0.969 and 0.922, 96.64% and 85.71%, 96.35% and 90.41%, respectively. The difference in AUC between two groups was statistically significant (P=0.007). MMBD was moderately negatively correlated with OP/IP.

    Conclusion 

    PDFF and OP/IP have certain value for the diagnosis of MMBD. The diagnostic performance of PDFF is better than OP/IP.

  • [1]
    Brigle K, Rogers B. Pathobiology and Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma[J]. Semin Oncol Nurs, 2017, 33(3): 225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.05.012
    [2]
    Schmeel FC, Luetkens JA, Wagenhäuser PJ, et al. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MRI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral lesions[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(6): 2397-2405. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5241-x
    [3]
    Zhang L, Li S, Hao S, et al. Quantification of fat deposition in bone marrow in the lumbar vertebra by proton MRS and in-phase and out-of-phase MRI for the diagnosis of osteoporosis[J]. J Xray Sci Technol, 2016, 24(2): 257-266. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=6074ddd91743f2b62bd68199a0067e24
    [4]
    Kumar NM, Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. Chemical shift imaging with in-phase and opposed-phase sequences at 3 T: what is the optimal threshold, measurement method, and diagnostic accuracy for characterizing marrow signal abnormalities?[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2018, 47(12): 1661-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2999-0
    [5]
    Douis H, Davies AM, Jeys L, et al. Chemical shift MRI can aid in the diagnosis of indeterminate skeletal lesions of the spine[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(4): 932-940. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3898-6
    [6]
    Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Kim DH, et al. Measurement of fat content in vertebral marrow using a modified dixon sequence to differentiate benign from malignant processes[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 45(5): 1534-1544. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25496
    [7]
    Akman B, Ata Korkmaz HA, Sarı A. Efficacy of chemical shift MRI for differentiating diffuse red bone marrow reconversion and hematological malignancies[J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2019, 49(2): 644-652. doi: 10.3906/sag-1812-125
    [8]
    Amin WM, Kotb HT, Abdel-Kerim AA, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI and in-phase/opposed-phase sequences in the assessment of bone tumors[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 44(3): 565-572. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25212
    [9]
    Lee SH, Lee YH, Hahn S, et al. Fat fraction estimation of morphologically normal lumbar vertebrae using the two-point mDixon turbo spin-echo MRI with flexible echo times and multipeak spectral model of fat: Comparison between cancer and non-cancer patients[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 34(8): 1114-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.05.007
    [10]
    Hansford BG, Silbermann R. Advanced Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2018, 9: 436. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00436
    [11]
    张勇, 程晓光, 于爱红, 等.腰椎椎体骨髓脂肪含量与骨密度、年龄关系的定量影像评估[J].中华放射学杂志, 2017, 51(10): 771-776. doi: 10.3760/j.issn.1005-1201.2017.10.010

    Zhang Y, Cheng XG, Yu AH, et al. Quantitative radiological evaluation of interaction of lumbar vertebral bone marrow fat, bone mineral density and age[J]. Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi, 2017, 51(10): 771-776. doi: 10.3760/j.issn.1005-1201.2017.10.010
    [12]
    Karampinos DC, Ruschke S, Dieckmeyer M, et al. Modeling of T2* decay in vertebral bone marrow fat quantification[J]. NMR Biomed, 2015, 28(11): 1535-1542. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3420
    [13]
    Shi YJ, Li XT, Zhang XY, et al. Differential diagnosis of hemangiomas from spinal osteolytic metastases using 3.0 T MRI: comparison of T1-weighted imaging, chemical-shift imaging, diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(41): 71095-71104. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=ff7d25bdfbe26da7083de234b73764fe&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [14]
    Baum T, Yap SP, Dieckmeyer M, et al. Assessment of whole spine vertebral bone marrow fat using chemical shift-encoding based water-fat MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 42(4): 1018-1023. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24854
  • Related Articles

    [1]JIN Guanghao, GU Ke. Advances in Bone Marrow Function Protection for Cervical Cancer Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Informed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2025, 52(9): 792-797. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.25.0182
    [2]ZHENG Jianqing, LI Tingting, XIAO Lihua, HUANG Bifen, WU Min. Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Pelvic Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer:A Meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(1): 52-57. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.0706
    [3]WANG Chengsheng, XUE Yunqing, HUANG Xinming, DUAN Qing. Imaging Features of Primary Hemangiopericytoma of Bone[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2017, 44(4): 276-280. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2017.04.008
    [4]LI Haiyuan, HUA Chenzhao, ZHOU Fenghai. Research Progress of Novel Endoscopic Imaging Technology for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(5): 418-421. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.05.021
    [5]WANG Shu, NI Qing. Accuracy of Mammography, Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Ductal Carcinoma in Situ[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(06): 597-600. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.06.014
    [6]Cao Changqi, Li Shijie, Li Ziyu, Zhang Jichang, Wu Qi. Application of Narrow Band Imaging in Diagnosis for Multiple Primary Cancer of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2012, 39(08): 997-1000. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.08.028
    [7]XU Li-ying, KONG Xiang-quan, XU Hai-bo, LIU Ding-xi, YU Qun, XIONG Yin. The Diagnosis of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Breast Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2004, 31(10): 617-618. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2565
    [8]XU Li-ying, KONG Xiang-quan, XU Hai-bo, LIU Ding-xi, YU Qun, ZENG Jun. The Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Enhanced MR Imaging for Special Types of Breast Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2004, 31(10): 611-613. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2567
    [9]GUAN Chang-qun, LI Ai-juan, YANG Ben-qiang, LIU Mei. Proton MR Spectroscopy and MRI Diagnosis in Brain Gliomas (Report of 20 cases)[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2004, 31(09): 559-560. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.3152
    [10]GUAN Chang qun, LI Ai juan, ZHOU Li juan, et al. Diagnosis of multiforme glioblastoma using CT and MRI (Report of 21 cases)[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2003, 30(01): 65-66. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.76

Catalog

    Corresponding author: PAN Shinong, cjr.panshinong@vip.163.com

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Article views (2640) PDF downloads (259) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return