| Citation: | SONG Jinling, LI Zhongwu, WEI Maomao, ZHOU Ni'na, YANG Zhi, WANG Xuejuan. Relation Between Metabolic Parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT and Clinicopathological Features of Colorectal Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2019, 46(11): 1006-1012. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2019.19.0665 |
To investigate the relation between 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and the clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
We included 358 CRC patients who met the admission criteria. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed before any treatment. Maximum standard uptake, average standard uptake, tumor metabolic volume (MTV) and total glycolysis (TLG) of the primary lesion of CRC were measured and calculated. The correlation of metabolic parameters with lesion location, pathological profile and TNM staging were investigated through Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test.
The MTV and TLG values in the primary foci of colon cancer were the highest, followed by sigmoid cancer and the lowest in rectal cancer, with statistically significant differences between the groups (P < 0.001). SUVmax values of poorly/poorly-moderately differentiated colorectal cancer were higher than those of moderately/well differentiated colorectal cancer (P=0.028). MTV values of primary mucinous adenocarcinoma were higher than those of primary adenocarcinoma (P=0.023). MTV and TLG values were higher in T4 lesions than those in T2-3 lesions (P=0.0001, P=0.007); SUVmax and SUVmean values of sigmoid carcinoma with distant metastasis were lower than those without distant metastasis(P=0.015, P=0.011).
The metabolic parameters of CRC are correlated with the lesion location, pathological features and TNM staging, which could partly reflect the pathological characteristics and heterogeneity of CRC.
| [1] |
Schinagl DA, Vogel WV, Hoffmann AL, et al. Comparison of five segmentation tools for 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography-based target volume definition in head and neck cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 69(4): 1282-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2333
|
| [2] |
Haraldsdottir S, Einarsdottir HM, Smaradottir A, et al. Colorectal cancer-review[J]. Laeknabladid, 2014, 100(2): 75-82. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gwyx-zlxfc201506008
|
| [3] |
田蓉蓉, 薄云峰, 张毅勋, 等. 18F-FDG PET/CT显像与结直肠癌治疗前分期的相关性研究[J].国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2018, 42(1): 9-14. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2018.01.002
Tian RR, Bo YF, Zhang YX, et al. Correlation between 18F-FDG PET/CT and pretreatment staging of colorectal cancer[J]. Guo Ji Fang She Yi Xue He Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2018, 42(1): 9-14. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2018.01.002
|
| [4] |
Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2015, 42(2): 328-354. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
|
| [5] |
Lucignani G. SUV and segmentation: pressing challenges in tumour assessment and treatment[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2009, 36(4): 715-720. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1085-1
|
| [6] |
Hatt M, Visvikis D, Albarghach NM, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2011, 38(7): 1191-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1755-7
|
| [7] |
李艳, 马红霞, 王瑞峰, 等. 18F-FDG PET/CT的SUV值与肺癌患者的临床特征、病理类型及肿瘤标记物的关系研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(21): 6881-6884. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2012.21.058
Li Y, Ma HX, Wang RF, et al. Relationship between SUV value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinical characteristics, pathological types and tumor markers of lung cancer patients[J]. Zhonghua Lin Chuang Yi Shi Za Zhi (Dian Zi Ban), 2012, 6(21): 6881-6884. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2012.21.058
|
| [8] |
Chang Y, Fu X, Sun Z, et al. Utility of baseline, interim and end-of-treatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma patients treated with L-asparaginase/pegaspargase[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 41057. doi: 10.1038/srep41057
|
| [9] |
Uchiyama S, Haruyama Y, Asada T, et al. Role of the standardized uptake value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in detecting the primary tumor and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancers[J]. Surg Today, 2012, 42(10): 956-961. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0225-6
|
| [10] |
王晓燕, 彭贵娟, 张祥松, 等.基于18氟-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射计算机断层成像术的最大标准化摄取值和放射线基线比值与结直肠癌术后预后的关系[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(3): 232-237. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2015.03.008
Wang XY, Peng GJ, Zhang XS, et al. Correlation of 18F-FDG PET-CT maximum standard uptake value and T/N ratio with the prognosis of postoperative colorectal cancer[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2015, 18(3): 232-237. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2015.03.008
|
| [11] |
李院江, 罗林海.左、右半结肠癌患者临床病理特点及预后差异分析[J].中外医疗, 2018, 37(24): 20-22. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhyx201528006
Li YJ, Luo LH. Clinical and Pathological Features and Prognosis of Patients with Left and Right Colon Cancer[J]. Zhong Wai Yi Liao, 2018, 37(24): 20-22. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zhyx201528006
|
| [12] |
Chen SW, Chen WT, Wu YC, et al. Which FDG/PET parameters of the primary tumors in colon or sigmoid cancer provide the best correlation with the pathological findings?[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(9): e405-e410. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.022
|
| [13] |
Lee HS, Kim HO, Hong YS, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic parameters in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis following curative-intent colorectal and hepatic surgery[J]. J Nucl Med, 2014, 55(4): 582-589. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.128629
|
| [14] |
Wang L, Liu Z, Fisher KW, et al. Prognostic value of programmed death ligand 1, p53, and Ki-67 in patients with advanced-stage colorectal cancer[J]. Hum Pathol, 2018, 71: 20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.07.014
|
| [15] |
Güreşci S, Özmen Ö, Uzman M, et al. Correlation of Ki-67 proliferation index and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in colorectal incidental lesions detected by positron emission tomography-computed tomography[J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2016, 46(4): 1182-1187. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=0ca9e1b5795bc7aad9917e92ba7e081a&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
| [16] |
Sugarbaker PH. Mucinous colorectal carcinoma[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2001, 77(4): 282-283. doi: 10.1002/jso.1111
|
| [17] |
Gonzalez RS, Cates JMM, Washington K. Associations among histological characteristics and patient outcomes in colorectal carcinoma with a mucinous component[J]. Histopathology, 2019, 74(3): 406-414. doi: 10.1111/his.13748
|
| [18] |
杨明, 冯彦林, 冼伟均, 等.应用18F-FDG PET/CT评估不同CD5表达的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤化疗疗效及价值[J].肿瘤防治研究, 2019, 46(10): 926-931. doi: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2019.19.0444
Yang M, Feng YL, Xian WJ, et al. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating chemotherapeutic effect of diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients with different CD5 expression[J]. Zhong Liu Fang Zhi Yan Jiu, 2019, 46(10): 926-931. doi: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2019.19.0444
|
| [1] | HAN Xue, LIU Shuqing, YIN Jiangling, WANG Changcheng. Expression of FOXM1 and PLK1 in Colorectal Cancer and Their Relationship with Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2025, 52(7): 605-610. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.24.1284 |
| [2] | LIU Xueqing, YANG Libo, LI Linhai, SHENG Ping, LIU Sicheng, LI Lihua. Relationship Between YWHAQ Expression and Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2025, 52(5): 393-399. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2025.24.1254 |
| [3] | PEI Zhenghao, ZHANG Hu, WANG Jun, HAO Yang. Expression of YBX1 and FOXA1 in Gastric Cancer and Their Clinicopathological Significance[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2022, 49(11): 1159-1164. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2022.22.0189 |
| [4] | DING Pingan, YANG Peigang, TIAN Yuan, LIN Yecheng, GUO Honghai, LIU Yang, ZHANG Zhidong, WANG Dong, LI Yong, ZHAO Qun. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Borrmann Type Ⅳ Gastric Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2021, 48(3): 261-267. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.0770 |
| [5] | CAO Xinhua, HAN Lifei, LYU Jianxin, HU Haolin, ZHANG Ya'nan. Association Between Family History of Malignant Neoplasms and Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(10): 752-755. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.20.0027 |
| [6] | YANG Hanjie, LIU Geliang, LIU Bo. Correlation of FoxO3 Gene with Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2019, 46(1): 58-62. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2019.18.0806 |
| [7] | XU Haitao, ZHANG Lianguo, LIU Jianwei, LIU Hongjian, ZHANG Qingguang. Relationship of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Expression with Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis of Cardiac Carcinoma Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(9): 779-782. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.09.010 |
| [8] | YAN Su, LI Bin, MA Xuxiang, MA Yingcai, XIONG Yuanzhi, GUO Xinjian, MA Yubin, YU Pengjie, WU Junqi, XIE Dawei, ZHAO Junhui, WU Huixian. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Young Gastric Cancer Patients in Hehuang Valley[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(05): 502-505. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.05.018 |
| [9] | HAN Xiaona, SUN Zhenqiang, TANG Yong, WANG Haijiang, QU Yanli, TANG Xushan. Relationship Between Preoperative Fibrinogen Level and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Colon Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2014, 41(12): 1326-1329. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.12.016 |
| [10] | Shi Xiaoyan, Wang Runjie, Liu Chaoying. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2012, 39(07): 826-828. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2012.07.015 |