高级搜索

子宫颈管搔刮术对宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的检出价值

王琦, 涂开家, 巢金珍, 曾莹, 傅佳, 敖梅红

王琦, 涂开家, 巢金珍, 曾莹, 傅佳, 敖梅红. 子宫颈管搔刮术对宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的检出价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2021, 48(2): 178-181. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.0711
引用本文: 王琦, 涂开家, 巢金珍, 曾莹, 傅佳, 敖梅红. 子宫颈管搔刮术对宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的检出价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2021, 48(2): 178-181. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.0711
WANG Qi, TU Kaijia, CHAO Jinzhen, ZENG Ying, FU Jia, AO Meihong. Value of Endocervical Curettage in Detection of High-grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2021, 48(2): 178-181. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.0711
Citation: WANG Qi, TU Kaijia, CHAO Jinzhen, ZENG Ying, FU Jia, AO Meihong. Value of Endocervical Curettage in Detection of High-grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2021, 48(2): 178-181. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.0711

子宫颈管搔刮术对宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的检出价值

基金项目: 

江西省青年科学基金 20171ACB21067

江西省卫生健康委科技计划 20203598

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王琦(1989-),女,硕士,主治医师,主要从事宫颈癌筛查及早诊早治的研究

    通信作者:

    涂开家(1982-),男,博士,副主任医师,主要从事妇科肿瘤临床及基础研究,E-mail: tukaijia@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: R711.74

Value of Endocervical Curettage in Detection of High-grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

Funding: 

Youth Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China 20171ACB21067

Science and Technology Program of Health Commission of Jiangxi Province 20203598

More Information
  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨子宫颈管搔刮术(ECC)对宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的检出价值。

    方法 

    回顾性分析678例具有完整病例资料患者的临床特点和阴道镜特征。

    结果 

    678例患者中仅经子宫颈活检确诊HSIL者391例(57.67%),仅ECC确诊HSIL者7例(1.03%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001);ECC诊断为HSIL 287例(42.33%,含子宫颈活检阳性和阴性病例),子宫颈活检诊断为HSIL 671例(98.97%,含ECC阳性和阴性病例),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。1型+2型转化区中ECC阳性68例(33.33%, 68/204),3型转化区中ECC阳性247例(52.11%, 247/474),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。≥45岁与 < 45岁者ECC阳性率分别为145例(55.13%, 145/263)和170例(40.96%, 170/415),两者比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。

    结论 

    子宫颈活检在HSIL的检出中占主导地位,ECC只能作为子宫颈活检的补充;年龄≥45岁或阴道镜检查为3型转化区时应该关注子宫颈管内病变。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To explore the value of endocervical curettage (ECC) in the detection of high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).

    Methods 

    We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features and colposcopical characteristics of 678 female patients with complete clinical data.

    Results 

    Among 678 cases, 391 cases were confirmed by cervical biopsy only and 7 cases by ECC only (57.67% vs. 1.03%, P < 0.001). ECC checked out 287 HSIL patients (42.33%, including cervical biopsy positive and negative cases) and cervical biopsy checked out 671 HSIL cases (98.97%, including ECC positive and negative cases). There were 68 positive ECC cases in the conversion area of Type 1+Type 2 and 247 positive ECC cases in the conversion area of Type 3(33.33% vs. 52.11%, P < 0.001). The positive rates of ECC in patients≥45 years old and < 45 years old were 145 and 170, respectively (55.13% vs. 40.96%, P < 0.001).

    Conclusion 

    The cervical biopsy plays a dominant role in the detection of HSIL, and ECC can only be used as a supplement to it. Female patients older than 45 years or with Type 3 transformation zone examined by colposcopy should be concerned with cervical lesions.

     

  • Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
    作者贡献:
    王琦:课题设计,资料收集及数据处理,撰写论文
    涂开家:课题指导,质控及审校,论文修改
    巢金珍、曾莹、傅佳:资料收集及数据处理
    敖梅红:课题指导,质控及审校,论文修改
  • 表  1   细胞学和HR-HPV联合检测及单一检测的检出率比较(n=678)

    Table  1   Detection rates of cytology, HR-HPV and their combination (n=678)

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   子宫颈活检和子宫颈管搔刮术检出病理结果比较

    Table  2   Pathological results of cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Burns A, Sanghvi H, Lu R, et al. Saving women's lives from cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9774): 1318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60543-6

    [2]

    Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, et al. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 120(1): 166-172. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318254f90c

    [3]

    Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, et al. WHO classification of female reproductive organs[M]. 4th ed. LYon: Iarc Press, 2014: 121-154.

    [4]

    Harper DM, Demars LR. Primary strategies for HPV infection and cervical cancer prevention[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 57(2): 256-278. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000027

    [5] 魏丽惠, 赵超. 宫颈癌及其癌前病变的筛查研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(1): 16-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHFY201601004.htm

    Wei LH, Zhao C. Research progress of screening for cervical cancer and its precancerous lesions[J]. Zhonghua Fu You Lin Chuang Yi Xue Za Zhi(Dian Zi Ban), 2016, 12(1): 16-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHFY201601004.htm

    [6]

    Stuebs FA, Schulmeyer CE, Mehlhorn G, et al. Accuracy of colposcopy -directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 299(2): 525-532. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4953-8

    [7]

    Cong Q, Fu Z, Zhang D, et al. Importance of colposcopy impression in the early diagnosis of posthysterectomy vaginal cancer[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2019, 23(1): 13-17. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000446

    [8]

    Gage JC, Duggan MA, Nation JG, et al. Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13, 115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 203(5): 481. e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.048

    [9]

    Nakamura Y, Matsumoto K, Satoh T, et al. Optimizing biopsy procedures during colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2015, 20(3): 579-585. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0739-6

    [10]

    Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Burchette RJ, et al. Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2011, 15(3): 180-188. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181fb4547

    [11] 李明珠, 赵昀, 魏丽惠. 阴道镜检查中需要关注的"风险评估"问题[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2019, 11(9): 8-9, 14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHFC201909003.htm

    Li MZ, Zhao Y, Wei LH. Colposcopy examination need to focus on "risk assessment" problem[J]. Zhongguo Ji Hua Sheng Yu He Fu Chan Ke, 2019, 11(9): 8-9, 14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHFC201909003.htm

    [12]

    Shepherd JP, Guido R, Lowder JL. Should endocervical curettage routinely be performed at the time of colposcopy? A cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2014, 18(2): 101-108. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182a0b572

    [13]

    Berkowitz RP. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(2 Pt 1): 393.

    [14] 张凌, 杜辉, 张薇, 等. 阴道镜下子宫颈多点活检及颈管内膜刮取术对高级别子宫颈病变的诊断价值[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2015, 50(4): 263-267.

    Zhang L, Du H, Zhang W, et al. Diagnostic value of multiply biopsies and endocervical curettage on cervical lesions[J]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 2015, 50(4): 263-267.

表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2880
  • HTML全文浏览量:  671
  • PDF下载量:  655
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-06-23
  • 修回日期:  2020-10-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-01-12
  • 刊出日期:  2021-02-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭