高级搜索

102例直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移患者临床病理特点及生存预后分析

周思成, 武海峰, 潘雨婷, 云红, 曹少木, 聂红霞, 兴伟, 梁建伟

周思成, 武海峰, 潘雨婷, 云红, 曹少木, 聂红霞, 兴伟, 梁建伟. 102例直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移患者临床病理特点及生存预后分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(1): 33-37. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0655
引用本文: 周思成, 武海峰, 潘雨婷, 云红, 曹少木, 聂红霞, 兴伟, 梁建伟. 102例直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移患者临床病理特点及生存预后分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2023, 50(1): 33-37. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0655
ZHOU Sicheng, WU Haifeng, PAN Yuting, YUN Hong, CAO Shaomu, NIE Hongxia, XING Wei, LIANG Jianwei. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival Prognosis Analysis of 102 Rectal Cancer Patients with Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(1): 33-37. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0655
Citation: ZHOU Sicheng, WU Haifeng, PAN Yuting, YUN Hong, CAO Shaomu, NIE Hongxia, XING Wei, LIANG Jianwei. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival Prognosis Analysis of 102 Rectal Cancer Patients with Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2023, 50(1): 33-37. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2023.22.0655

102例直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移患者临床病理特点及生存预后分析

基金项目: 

中国癌症基金会北京希望马拉松专项基金 LC2020A37

详细信息
    作者简介:

    周思成(1993-),男,博士,住院医师,主要从事结直肠癌分子机制研究与微创手术治疗

    武海峰(1982-),男,本科,主治医师,主要从事结直肠肛门外科的微创治疗

    通信作者:

    梁建伟(1976-),男,博士,主任医师,主要从事结直肠癌及盆底相关复杂手术治疗,E-mail: Liangjw1976@163.com

    *:并列第一作者

  • 中图分类号: R656.9;R735.3

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival Prognosis Analysis of 102 Rectal Cancer Patients with Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases

Funding: 

Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of Cancer Foundation of China LC2020A37

More Information
    Corresponding author:

    LIANG Jianwei, E-mail: Liangjw1976@163.com

    *: Contributed Equally as the First Author

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨侧方淋巴结清扫术(LPLND)在侧方淋巴结(LPLN)转移患者中的治疗效果及预后意义。

    方法 

    回顾性分析2012年1月—2020年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院和北京大学第一医院行全直肠系膜切除术(TME)联合LPLND术后病理证实LPLN转移的直肠癌患者的临床病理资料。探讨LPLN转移患者临床病理特点与转移规律,同时进行预后分析。

    结果 

    共纳入102例病理证实LPLN转移的直肠癌患者。LPLN常见转移部位依次为髂内淋巴结(n=68, 66.7%)、闭孔淋巴结(n=44, 43.1%)和髂总/髂外淋巴结(n=12, 11.8%)。10例(9.8%)患者出现双侧LPLN转移,平均LPLN转移数量为2.2±2.4,其中16例(15.7%)患者LPLN转移数量≥2。LPLN转移至髂外/髂总淋巴结的患者3年总体生存率(OS)(66.8% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001)与无瘤生存率(DFS)(39.1% vs. 10.5%, P=0.012)明显低于转移至髂内/闭孔淋巴结转移的患者。多因素分析显示LPLN转移至髂外/髂总是影响OS(HR=3.53; 95%CI: 1.50~8.31; P=0.004)和DFS(HR=2.40; 95%CI: 1.05~5.47; P=0.037)的共同独立危险因素。

    结论 

    LPLN转移主要位于髂内血管与闭孔区域。转移至髂外或髂总淋巴结患者的生存预后无法通过LPLND改善,全身性综合治疗往往是此类患者的最佳治疗选择。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To investigate the therapeutic effect and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node dissection (LPLND) in patients with lateral lymph node (LPLN) metastasis.

    Methods 

    The clinicopathological data of rectal cancer patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) combined with LPLND and pathologically confirmed as LPLN metastasis after operation were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics and metastasis rules of patients with LPLN metastasis were discussed, and the survival prognosis after LPLND was analyzed.

    Results 

    A total of 102 rectal cancer patients with pathologically confirmed LPLN metastasis were included. The common sites of LPLN metastasis were internal iliac vessels lymph nodes (n=68, 66.7%), followed by obturator lymph nodes (n=44, 43.1%), and common iliac vessels or external iliac vessels lymph nodes (n=12, 11.8%). There were 10 patients (9.8%) with bilateral LPLN metastases, and the mean number of LPLN metastases was 2.2±2.4, among which 16 patients (15.7%) had LPLN metastases number≥2. The 3-year OS (66.8% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001) and DFS (39.1% vs. 10.5%, P=0.012) of patients with LPLN metastases to the external iliac or common iliac lymph node were significantly lower than those with metastases to the internal iliac or obturator lymph node. The multivariate analysis showed that LPLN metastasis to external iliac or common iliac lymph node was an independent risk factor both for OS (HR=3.53; 95%CI: 1.50-8.31; P=0.004) and DFS (HR=2.40; 95%CI: 1.05-5.47; P=0.037).

    Conclusion 

    LPLN mainly metastasizes to the internal iliac or obturator lymph node areas. The survival of patients with metastasis to the external iliac or common iliac lymph node cannot be improved by LPLND, and thus systemic comprehensive treatment is often the optimal treatment option.

     

  • Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
    作者贡献:
    周思成、武海峰:研究设计、实验实施、论文撰写及修改
    潘雨婷、云红、曹少木、聂红霞:数据收集与统计学分析
    兴伟:研究设计、写作指导与文章修改
    梁建伟:研究设计
  • 图  1   102例直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移患者的总体生存曲线(A)无瘤生存曲线(B)

    Figure  1   Overall survival curve(A) and disease-free survival curve(B) of 102 rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastases

    图  2   侧方淋巴结转移转移至髂内/闭孔和髂总/髂外患者的总体生存曲线(A)与无瘤生存曲线(B)

    Figure  2   Overall survival curve(A) and disease-free survival curve(B) of patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis to external/common iliac lymph nodes or internal iliac/obturator lymph node

    表  1   102例直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移患者的临床病理资料(n(%))

    Table  1   Clinicopathological data of 102 rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastases (n(%))

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   102例直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移患者的预后单因素及多因素Cox回归分析

    Table  2   Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for prognosis of 102 rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastases

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Miyata S, et al. Results of a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional study on lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer: is it regional or distant disease?[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(6): 1129-1134. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182565d9d

    [2]

    Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, et al. Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006, 49(11): 1663-1672. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0714-z

    [3]

    Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, et al. Mesorectal Excision With or Without Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ Lower Rectal Cancer (JCOG0212): A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Noninferiority Trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 266(2): 201-207. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002212

    [4]

    Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Shida D, et al. Potential impact of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for low rectal cancer on prognoses and local control: A comparison of 2 high-volume centers in Japan that employ different policies concerning LLND[J]. Surgery, 2017, 162(2): 303-314. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.02.005

    [5]

    Zhou S, Jiang Y, Pei W, et al. Prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-low rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: a propensity score matching study[J]. BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1): 136. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09254-4

    [6]

    Nicholls RJ, Zinicola R, Haboubi N. Extramural spread of rectal cancer and the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition, 2017[J]. Ann Oncol, 2019, 30(8): 1394-1395.

    [7]

    Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2020, 25(1): 1-42. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z

    [8]

    Sato H, Maeda K, Maruta M. Prognostic significance of lateral lymph node dissection in node positive low rectal carcinoma[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2011, 26(7): 881-889. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1170-3

    [9]

    Wang L, Hirano Y, Heng G, et al. The signifcance of lateral lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching study[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 25(7): 1866-1874. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04825-x

    [10]

    Numata M, Tamagawa H, Kazama K, et al. Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and efective in a practice-based cohort?[J]. BMC Surg, 2021, 21(1): 51. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01053-1

    [11]

    Yokoyama S, Takifuji K, Hotta T, et al. Survival beneft of lateral lymph node dissection according to the region of involvement and the number of lateral lymph nodes involved[J]. Surg Today, 2014, 44(6): 1097-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0815-y

    [12] 汤坚强, 李华玉, 刘涛, 等. 低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫策略30年变迁: 单中心289例治疗体会及预后分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(10): 889-896. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200920-00530

    Tang JQ, Li Huayu, Liu Tao, et al. Thirty years' changes of the strategy of lateral lymph node dissection in low rectal cancer: treatment experience and prognostic analysis of 289 cases in one single center[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2021, 24(10): 889-896. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200920-00530

    [13]

    Morohashi H, Sakamoto Y, Miura T, et al. Effective dissection for rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis based on prognostic factors and recurrence type[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2021, 36(6): 1251-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03870-5

    [14]

    Ogura A, Konishi T, Cunningham C, et al. Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy With Total Mesorectal Excision Only Is Not Sufficient to Prevent Lateral Local Recurrence in Enlarged Nodes: Results of the Multicenter Lateral Node Study of Patients With Low cT3/4 Rectal Cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(1): 33-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00032

图(2)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2747
  • HTML全文浏览量:  699
  • PDF下载量:  390
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-06-12
  • 修回日期:  2022-08-22
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-01-12
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭