高级搜索
吗啡缓释片直肠、口服给药方式在癌痛治疗 中的疗效比较[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2008, 35(S1): 26-27. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.982
引用本文: 吗啡缓释片直肠、口服给药方式在癌痛治疗 中的疗效比较[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2008, 35(S1): 26-27. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.982
Comparison of Morphine Sustained Release Tablets between Rectal Administration and O2 ral Administration in Treatment of Cancer Pain[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2008, 35(S1): 26-27. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.982
Citation: Comparison of Morphine Sustained Release Tablets between Rectal Administration and O2 ral Administration in Treatment of Cancer Pain[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2008, 35(S1): 26-27. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.982

吗啡缓释片直肠、口服给药方式在癌痛治疗 中的疗效比较

Comparison of Morphine Sustained Release Tablets between Rectal Administration and O2 ral Administration in Treatment of Cancer Pain

  • 摘要: 目的 比较吗啡缓释片直肠、口服两种给药方式在癌痛控制中的疗效和胃肠道反应情况。方法 120 名中晚期癌痛患者随机分成4 组,每组30 人。每组患者给予吗啡缓释片(30~60 mg) 止痛治疗, 每日2 次,共4 周。OR 组第1~2 周口服给药,第3~4 周直肠给药;RO 组第1~2 周直肠给药,第3~4 周口服给药;OO 组第1~4 周口服给药;RR 组第1~4 周直肠给药,观察两种给药方式在癌痛控制中的疗效和胃肠道反应情况。结果 吗啡缓释片直肠、口服给药两种方式的镇痛缓解总有效率(RR) 分别:OR 组77 %, RO 组80 %, OO 组82 %, RR 组77 %。直肠给药方式的胃肠道反应情况明显低于口服给药方式。结论 吗啡缓释片通过直肠给药可以取得与口服给药一样的镇痛效果,且减少了胃肠道不良反应。

     

    Abstract: Objective  To compare rectal administ ration with oral administ ration in the t reatment of cancer pain and the side effect s. Methods  One hundred and twenty patient s with cancer pain were randomly di2 vided into 4 group s with 30 patient s in each group. The patient s were given sustained2release morphine tablet s with total dosage of 30~60 mg/ d, twice daily. OR group was administered orally in the first two weeks and rectally in the later two weeks ; RO group was administered rectally in the first and second weeks, orally in the third and th fort weeks ; OO group was administered orally in four weeks ; RR group was administered rectally in four weeks. The analgesic efficacy and the side effect s of nausea, vomiting and constipation were compared. Results  Af ter the patient s given sustained2release morphine tablet s, RR was 77 % (OR group), 80 %(RO group), 82 % (OO group), 77 % (RR group) . The occuring rate of nausea was 24 % (OR group), 3 %(RO group), 33 % (OO group), 18 % (RR group) ; vomiting was 16 % (OR group), 13 %(RO group), 20 % (OO group), 3. 3 % ( RR group ), constipation was 20 % (OR group), 14 %(RO group), 33 % (OO group), 20 % (RR group) . Conclusion  The patient s given sustained2release morphine tablet s with rectal administ ration got the same analgesic effect s and less adverse reactions com2 pared with the patient s given sustained2release morphine tablet s with oral administ ration.

     

/

返回文章
返回