高级搜索
Chk1/2和Plk1蛋白在子宫内膜癌中的表达[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2008, 35(06): 424-426. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2327
引用本文: Chk1/2和Plk1蛋白在子宫内膜癌中的表达[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2008, 35(06): 424-426. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2327
Expressions of Chk1/2 and Plk1 Protein in Endometrial Carcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2008, 35(06): 424-426. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2327
Citation: Expressions of Chk1/2 and Plk1 Protein in Endometrial Carcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2008, 35(06): 424-426. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2327

Chk1/2和Plk1蛋白在子宫内膜癌中的表达

Expressions of Chk1/2 and Plk1 Protein in Endometrial Carcinoma

  • 摘要: 目的 Chk1/2(checkpoint kinase 1、2)和Plk1(polo-like kinase 1)是各细胞周期检测点启动DNA损伤修复的主要激酶,本研究检测3种激酶在子宫内膜癌及正常子宫内膜组织中的表达,探讨3种蛋白在两者之间的表达差异、与子宫内膜癌临床病理特征的关系及3种蛋白表达的相关性。方法 应用免疫组化SP法检测44例子宫内膜癌组织和21例正常子宫内膜组织中Chk1、Chk2和Plk1蛋白的表达情况。结果 Chk1、Chk2和Plk1蛋白在子宫内膜癌患者中的阳性率分别为47.7%、75.0%和31.8%,在正常子宫内膜中的阳性率分别为61.9%、61.9%和4.8%;Plk1蛋白在子宫内膜癌组织中的表达显著高于正常子宫内膜组织(P<0.01),而Chk1、Chk2的表达差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Chk1、Chk2和Plk1蛋白的表达在不同年龄、病理类型和临床分期的子宫内膜癌患者中差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但Chk1的表达在不同分化程度的子宫内膜癌患者中差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。Spearman等级相关分析,在44例子宫内膜癌患者中,Chk2与Plk1间的表达呈正相关(r=0.482,P=0.001)。结论 Plk1可能成为子宫内膜癌比较理想的治疗靶点,而CHK1/2在子宫内膜癌中表达及意义还有待进一步研究。

     

    Abstract: Objective  Chk1/ 2 (checkpoint kinase 1/ 2) and Plk1 (polo2like kinase 1) play the major role in cell cycle checkpoint block when DNA lesion are emerged, this study was to investigate the expression of these kinases in endomet rial carcinoma and healthy endomet ria, and to explore their relationships with clinical pathology parameters of endomet rial carcinoma and the correlations among three kinases. Methods  Immunohistochemist ry was applied to detect the expressions of Chk1, Chk2 and Plk1 in 44 cases of en2 domet rial carcinoma and 21 cases of healthy endomet ria. Results  The positive percentages of Chk1, Chk2 and Plk1 were 47. 7 %、75. 0 % and 31. 8 % respectively in endomet rial carcinoma, and were 61. 9 %、61. 9 % and 4. 8 % respectively in healthy endomet ria ; The expression of plk1 proteins in endomet rial car2 cinoma was higher than that in healthy endomet ria, and the difference of plk1 was significant ( P < 0. 01), while the expression differences of Chk1 and chk2 were no significant ( P > 0. 05) . The expressions of Chk1, Chk2 and Plk1 were not associated with the age, pathology and clinical stage of endomet rial carci2 noma patient s ( P > 0. 05), while Chk1 expressions associated with differentiation of endomet rial carcino2 ma ( P < 0. 05) . In 44 endomet rial carcinoma cases, Chk2 was positively correlated with plk1 ( r = 0. 482, P = 0. 001) . Conclusion  Plk1 might be ideal target s for endomet rial carcinoma therapy, while the expres2 sions and significances of CHK1/ 2 in endomet rial carcinoma need further research.

     

/

返回文章
返回