高级搜索
EP和CAP方案治疗老年人中晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2000, 27(04): 271-272. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2058
引用本文: EP和CAP方案治疗老年人中晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2000, 27(04): 271-272. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2058
A Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of EP and CAP Regimen for Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer of Older Patient[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2000, 27(04): 271-272. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2058
Citation: A Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of EP and CAP Regimen for Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer of Older Patient[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2000, 27(04): 271-272. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2058

EP和CAP方案治疗老年人中晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效观察

A Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of EP and CAP Regimen for Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer of Older Patient

  • 摘要: 目的 比较EP方案(Vp-16胶囊,DDP)与CAP方案(CTX、ADM与DDP)治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法 60例晚期非小细胞肺癌随机分成两组、各30例。结果 EP组有效率为38.8%、CAP组为33.3%,两组间疗效无显著性差异(P>0.05)。CAP组消化系统毒性作用及脱发反应较EP组严重、造血系统毒性反应相似。结论 两方案可作为老年人非小细胞肺癌一线方案,DDP、Vp-16胶囊方案易行、毒副反应小、耐受性好。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the curative effects of EP (oral Vp-16 capsule+DDP)regimen and CAP(CTX+ADM+DDP)regimen on non-small cell lung Cancer of older patient. Methods 60 cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer were randomly divided into two groups.Each group has 30 cases. Results Response rates of EP regimen and CAP regimen were 38.8% and 33.3% respectively.There was no statistical significant difference between them (P>0.05).Gastrointestinal tract reaction and epilation reaction of CAP regimen were more serious than that of EP regimen(P<0.05).Mylos-suppression had no statistical difference between two regimens. Conclusion Both EP regimen an CAP regimen can be used as first line regimens for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer of older patient.The EP regimen is regarded as a better,convenient and tolerable regimen.

     

/

返回文章
返回