高级搜索
贾牧原, 张洪俊, 李琳, 吴剑慧, 龚欢欢, 任博文, 刘涵. 晚期非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者一线免疫治疗有效性的网络荟萃分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2024, 51(5): 336-341. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2024.23.1212
引用本文: 贾牧原, 张洪俊, 李琳, 吴剑慧, 龚欢欢, 任博文, 刘涵. 晚期非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者一线免疫治疗有效性的网络荟萃分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2024, 51(5): 336-341. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2024.23.1212
JIA Muyuan, ZHANG Hongjun, LI Lin, WU Jianhui, GONG Huanhuan, REN Bowen, LIU Han. Network Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness of First-Line Immunotherapy Treatments for Patients with Brain Metastases from Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2024, 51(5): 336-341. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2024.23.1212
Citation: JIA Muyuan, ZHANG Hongjun, LI Lin, WU Jianhui, GONG Huanhuan, REN Bowen, LIU Han. Network Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness of First-Line Immunotherapy Treatments for Patients with Brain Metastases from Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2024, 51(5): 336-341. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2024.23.1212

晚期非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者一线免疫治疗有效性的网络荟萃分析

Network Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness of First-Line Immunotherapy Treatments for Patients with Brain Metastases from Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移患者一线免疫治疗有效性进行网络荟萃分析。
    方法 计算机检索Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane等数据库的文献,由2名研究者筛选文献、提取资料并对纳入研究进行偏倚风险评估,使用R(4.1.3)软件对纳入临床试验进行统计分析。对于研究结局指标OS、PFS,从纳入研究中提取风险比(HR)和95%可信区间(CI),进行对数转换为效应分析统计量。
    结果 最终纳入6篇随机对照试验(RCT)文献,包括327例不可剔除NSCLC脑转移患者。网状荟萃分析提示:与传统化疗提升患者OS相比PD-1抑制剂+CTLA-4更具优势(HR: 0.13,95%CI: 0.03~0.71),其次是PD-L1抑制剂(HR: 0.17,95%CI: 0.04~0.74)和PD-1抑制剂+化疗(HR: 0.36,95%CI: 0.2~0.63)。与传统化疗提升患者PFS相比,PD-1抑制剂+CTLA-4最具优势(HR: 0.37,95%CI: 0.15~0.93),其次是PD-L1抑制剂+化疗(HR: 0.44,95%CI: 0.29~0.66)和PD-1抑制剂(HR: 0.48,95%CI: 0.27~0.86)。
    结论 免疫检查点抑制剂治疗可提高晚期NSCLC脑转移患者的生存期,尤其PD-1抑制剂与CTLA-4抑制剂的联合治疗显示出优异的生存获益。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To conduct a network meta-analysis on the effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy on patients with brain metastases from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Methods Two investigators conducted a computerized search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and other databases to screen the literature, extract the information, and assess the risk of bias of the included studies. The included clinical trials were statistically analyzed using R (4.1.3) software. For the study outcome indicators OS and PFS, the risk ratios (HRs), and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from the included studies and logarithmically transformed into effect analysis statistics.
    Results Six randomized controlled trials were finally included, including 327 patients with non-excludable NSCLC brain metastases. Network meta-analysis suggested that PD-1 inhibitor + CTLA-4 was more advantageous than the conventional chemotherapy for enhancing patients’ OS (HR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.03-0.71), followed by PD-L1 inhibitor (HR: 0.17, 95%CI: 0.04-0.74) and PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy (HR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.2-0.63). PD-1 inhibitor + CTLA-4 was also more advantageous (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.15-0.93) than the conventional chemotherapy for boosting patients’ PFS, followed by PD-L1 inhibitor + chemotherapy (HR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.29-0.66) and PD-1 inhibitor (HR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.27-0.86).
    Conclusion Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy improves the survival of patients with brain metastases from advanced NSCLC. In particular, the combination of PD-1 inhibitor and CTLA-4 inhibitor show excellent survival benefit.

     

/

返回文章
返回