高级搜索
陈广英, 马俊勋, 胡毅. DNA修复基因及其TP53共突变在肺腺癌免疫治疗疗效预测中的价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2021, 48(7): 704-708. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.1438
引用本文: 陈广英, 马俊勋, 胡毅. DNA修复基因及其TP53共突变在肺腺癌免疫治疗疗效预测中的价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2021, 48(7): 704-708. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.1438
CHEN Guangying, MA Junxun, HU Yi. Value of DNA Repair Gene and TP53 Co-mutation in Predicting Effect of Immunotherapy on Lung Adenocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2021, 48(7): 704-708. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.1438
Citation: CHEN Guangying, MA Junxun, HU Yi. Value of DNA Repair Gene and TP53 Co-mutation in Predicting Effect of Immunotherapy on Lung Adenocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2021, 48(7): 704-708. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2021.20.1438

DNA修复基因及其TP53共突变在肺腺癌免疫治疗疗效预测中的价值

Value of DNA Repair Gene and TP53 Co-mutation in Predicting Effect of Immunotherapy on Lung Adenocarcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 基于二代测序技术,探索DNA修复基因(DRGs)对肺腺癌免疫治疗疗效的预测价值。
    方法 选取癌症基因组图谱中肺腺癌两个独立数据集(分别为测试集和验证集)。测试集中,依据肿瘤突变负荷评分15为阈值,分为低突变负荷组和高突变负荷组,分析不同肿瘤突变负荷与肺腺癌总生存的关系,并以KRAS/TP53共突变作为标准参照,分析DRGs突变及其与KRAS或者TP53的共突变,预测肿瘤突变数量及肿瘤突变负荷的效能。在验证集中分析DRGs突变及其共突变在肿瘤突变负荷、新生抗原以及无进展生存期等方面的差异。
    结果 相比单纯TP53或DRGs突变组,TP53/DRGs共突变组具有更高的肿瘤突变数量和肿瘤突变负荷,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);与标准参照KRAS/TP53共突变组相比,亦显示出更高的肿瘤突变数量和肿瘤突变负荷,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.037, P=0.044)。在验证集分析中,相比单纯TP53或DRG突变或KRAS/TP53共突变的患者,TP53/DRGs共突变组患者也显示出较高的肿瘤新生抗原、肿瘤突变负荷和更长的无进展生存期。
    结论 TP53/DRGs共突变或许可以作为肺腺癌免疫治疗疗效预测的标志物。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the value of DNA repair genes (DRGs) in predicting the effect of immunotherapy on lung adenocarcinoma based on second-generation sequencing technology.
    Methods The data of lung adenocarcinoma were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas, including the testing cohort and the validation cohort. In the testing set, according to the cut-off value of tumor mutational burden (TMB) score 15, the patients with lung adenocarcinoma were divided into two groups: the low TMB score group and the high TMB score group. And we analyzed the relation between TMB and the overall survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients. KRAS and TP53 co-mutation was used as the standard control, the differences in the mutation count and TMB score between only DRGs mutation group and KRAS or TP53 co-mutation groups were analyzed. In the validation cohort, the differences between DRGs and KRAS or TP53 co-mutation groups in TMB, tumor neoantigen burden and PFS were analyzed.
    Results The patients with TP53/DRGs co-mutation had higher mutation count and TMB score than those patients with only TP53 or DRGs mutation (P < 0.05). The patients with TP53/DRGs co-mutation had higher mutation count and TMB score than those patients with KRAS/TP53 co-mutation (P=0.037, P=0.044). In validation cohort analysis, the TP53/DRGs co-mutation patients also showed higher tumor neoantigens, higher TMB and longer progression-free survival than those patients with only TP53 or DRGs or KRAS/TP53 co-mutation groups.
    Conclusion TP53/DRGs co-mutation may be served as a pair of potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy on lung adenocarcinoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回