高级搜索
魏铃, 王丰哲, 殷国良, 潘诗农. PDFF和OP/IP对胸、腰椎多发性骨髓瘤骨病的诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(2): 115-118. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.0906
引用本文: 魏铃, 王丰哲, 殷国良, 潘诗农. PDFF和OP/IP对胸、腰椎多发性骨髓瘤骨病的诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(2): 115-118. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.0906
WEI Ling, WANG Fengzhe, YIN Guoliang, PAN Shinong. Diagnostic Value of PDFF and OP/IP for Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(2): 115-118. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.0906
Citation: WEI Ling, WANG Fengzhe, YIN Guoliang, PAN Shinong. Diagnostic Value of PDFF and OP/IP for Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(2): 115-118. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.0906

PDFF和OP/IP对胸、腰椎多发性骨髓瘤骨病的诊断价值

Diagnostic Value of PDFF and OP/IP for Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨化学位移水脂磁共振成像的质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)和同、反相位成像(OP/IP)对胸、腰椎多发性骨髓瘤骨病(MMBD)的诊断价值。
    方法 所有MMBD患者均行脊柱矢状位T1WI、矢状位STIR、矢状位mDxion quant和矢状位mDxion FFE扫描。将正常椎体及良性病变椎体并为非MMBD病变组,MMBD病变椎体为MMBD病变组,分别测量PDFF值和OP/IP值;进行两独立样本t检验,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估两参数对MMBD的诊断效能,用Youden指数法计算OP/IP和PDFF的诊断临界值;利用Pearson检验分析两参数的相关性。
    结果 MMBD病变组的PDFF明显低于非MMBD病变组,OP/IP明显高于非MMBD病变组,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。PDFF和OP/IP的诊断界值分别为8.45%和0.66,PDFF的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)(0.969) > OP/IP(0.922),两者的敏感度分别为96.64%和85.71%,特异性分别为96.35%和90.41%。两者的AUC差异有统计学意义(P=0.007)。PDFF与OP/IP呈中度负相关。
    结论 PDFF和OP/IP对于MMBD的诊断均有一定价值,PDFF的诊断效能优于OP/IP。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and in phase and out of phase imaging (OP/IP) for thoracic and lumbar multiple myeloma bone disease (MMBD).
    Methods All patients underwent spinal MRI, including sagittal T1WI, sagittal STIR, sagittal mDxion quant and sagittal mDxion FFE. The normal vertebrae and benign lesion vertebrae were non-MMBD lesion group, and the MMBD lesion vertebrae was MMBD lesion group, and the PDFF and OP/IP value were measured respectively. Two independent sample t-tests were performed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the two parameters for MMBD; the Pearson test was used to analyze the correlation between the two parameters. The diagnostic cutoff value of OP/IP and PDFF were calculated by Youden index method.
    Results The PDFF of the MMBD lesion group was lower while the OP/IP was higher than those of the non-MMBD lesion group (both P < 0.05). The diagnostic cutoff values, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), the sensitivity, the specificity of PDFF and OP/IP were 8.45% and 0.66, 0.969 and 0.922, 96.64% and 85.71%, 96.35% and 90.41%, respectively. The difference in AUC between two groups was statistically significant (P=0.007). MMBD was moderately negatively correlated with OP/IP.
    Conclusion PDFF and OP/IP have certain value for the diagnosis of MMBD. The diagnostic performance of PDFF is better than OP/IP.

     

/

返回文章
返回