高级搜索
陈鹏程, 毛伟敏. 清肺合剂联合化疗治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2016, 43(7): 609-615. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.07.014
引用本文: 陈鹏程, 毛伟敏. 清肺合剂联合化疗治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2016, 43(7): 609-615. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.07.014
CHEN Pengcheng, MAO Weimin. Clinical Investigation on Qingfei Mixture Combined with Chemotherapy on Middle and Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(7): 609-615. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.07.014
Citation: CHEN Pengcheng, MAO Weimin. Clinical Investigation on Qingfei Mixture Combined with Chemotherapy on Middle and Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2016, 43(7): 609-615. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2016.07.014

清肺合剂联合化疗治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

Clinical Investigation on Qingfei Mixture Combined with Chemotherapy on Middle and Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的  探讨中药清肺合剂联合化疗治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。
    方法  将2011年11月至2014年2月中晚期NSCLC患者98例随机分为单纯化疗组(对照组)34例和清肺合剂联合化疗组(试验组)64例。比较两组患者在临床疗效、总生存率(OS)、不良反应以及生活质量上的差异。
    结果  试验组治疗有效率为11.8%,疾病控制率为76.5%;对照组治疗有效率为24.0%,疾病控制率为76.0%。两组之间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。本组失访6例,随访率为89.8%。两组1、2年生存率比较差异均无统计学意义(P=0.569; P=0.802)。Cox多因素分析表明,化疗周期数是影响NSCLC患者预后的独立危险因素(HR=0.358, 95%CI: 0.158~0.810, P=0.014)。按照实体瘤的中医肿瘤疗效评定标准,治疗后对照组中医疗效评分(50.89±6.47),试验组为(54.12±6.77),两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.742)。两组患者治疗期间在白细胞、血小板、血红蛋白、转氨酶以及肌酐等指标上比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论  清肺合剂联合化疗治疗中晚期NSCLC与单纯化疗比较,在近期疗效、1年和2年生存率、临床症状改善和不良反应方面均无明显差异。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To investigate the efficacy of Chinese medicine Qingfei Mixture combined with chemotherapy on middle and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
    Methods  From November 2011 to February 2014, 98 cases with middle and advanced NSCLC were randomly divided into two groups: chemotherapy alone group (the control group, 34 cases) and Qingfei Mixture combined with chemotherapy group (the experimental group, 64 cases). The differences of clinical curative effect, overall survival(OS), toxicities and quality of life(QOL) between the two groups were compared.
    Results  The response rate (RR) was 11.8% and disease control rate(DCR) was 76.5% in the experimental group. In the control group, the RR was 24.0% and DCR was 76.0%. There was no significant difference in RR or DCR between two groups(all P>0.05). The follow-up rate in the investigation was 89.8% with six cases lost to follow up. There was no significant difference in 1- or 2- year survival rate between the two groups(P=0.569; P=0.802). Cox multivariate analysis showed that chemotherapy cycle was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of patients with NSCLC (HR=0.358, 95%CI: 0.158-0.810, P=0.014). According to the evaluation standard of TCM therapeutic effect of solid tumor, the traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) efficacy score in the control group after treatment was (50.89±6.47) and that in the experimental group was (54.12±6.77), without significant difference between the two groups(P=0.742). During the treatment, there was no significant difference in white blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin, transaminase or creatinine between the two groups (all P>0.05).
    Conclusion  Compared with chemotherapy alone, there is no significant difference in recent response, 1- and 2-year survival rates, clinical symptoms improvement or toxicities in Qingfei Mixture combined with chemotherapy on middle and advanced NSCLC patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回