高级搜索
含奥沙利铂方案与FOLFIRI方案一线化疗对K-ras基因不同状态晚期大肠癌患者的疗效及预后影响比较[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(03): 280-284. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.03.015
引用本文: 含奥沙利铂方案与FOLFIRI方案一线化疗对K-ras基因不同状态晚期大肠癌患者的疗效及预后影响比较[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2015, 42(03): 280-284. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.03.015
Comparison of Efficacy and Prognosis of Oxaliplatin-based Regimens and FOLFIRI Regimen as First-line Chemotherapy for Stage Ⅳ Colorectal Cancer Patients with Different K-ras Statuses[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(03): 280-284. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.03.015
Citation: Comparison of Efficacy and Prognosis of Oxaliplatin-based Regimens and FOLFIRI Regimen as First-line Chemotherapy for Stage Ⅳ Colorectal Cancer Patients with Different K-ras Statuses[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2015, 42(03): 280-284. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2015.03.015

含奥沙利铂方案与FOLFIRI方案一线化疗对K-ras基因不同状态晚期大肠癌患者的疗效及预后影响比较

Comparison of Efficacy and Prognosis of Oxaliplatin-based Regimens and FOLFIRI Regimen as First-line Chemotherapy for Stage Ⅳ Colorectal Cancer Patients with Different K-ras Statuses

  • 摘要: 目的 探究含奥沙利铂方案与FOLFIRI方案对Ⅳ期结直肠癌化疗疗效及预后影响的差别与K-ras基因状态的关系。方法 收集2010年1月至2012年1月的118例接受含奥沙利铂方案或FOLFIRI方案化疗的Ⅳ期结直肠癌患者临床资料,统计患者的治疗有效率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存时间(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用χ2检验比较各组临床因素差别和两种治疗方案的有效率及疾病控制率,采用Kaplan-Meier法比较无进展生存时间以及总生存期。结果 118例患者中,接受含奥沙利铂方案化疗的K-ras突变型患者PFS及OS较接受FOLFIRI方案化疗患者延长(P=0.048;P=0.037),ORR及DCR较接受FOLFIRI方案化疗患者无明显差别(P=0.961;P=0.931)。接受含奥沙利铂方案化疗的K-ras野生型患者ORR、DCR、PFS及OS较接受FOLFIRI方案化疗患者无明显差别(P=0.900;P=0.802;P=0.738;P=0.904)。结论 采用含奥沙利铂方案一线化疗较FOLFIRI方案对K-ras突变型Ⅳ期结直肠癌患者更有优势,而对于K-ras野生型Ⅳ期结直肠癌患者,含奥沙利铂方案与FOLFIRI方案疗效及预后情况相当。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy and prognosis of oxaliplatin-based regimens and FOLFIRI regimen as the first-line chemotherapy for stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer patients with different K-ras statuses. Methods We collected clinical data of 118 stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens or FOLFIRI regimen as the first-line chemotherapy from Jan. 2010 to Jan. 2012. The cumulative survival rate, objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR), progression free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) of the cases were calculated. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences of clinical factors, ORR and DCR between different groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the differences of PFS and OS. Results Oxaliplatin-based regimens chemotherapy prolonged PFS and OS of the K-ras mutant patients compared with FOLFIRI regimen chemotherapy (P=0.048; P=0.037). ORR and DCR of the K-ras mutant patients treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens chemotherapy were not significantly different from those with FOLFIRI regimen chemotherapy (P=0.961; P=0.931). ORR, DCR, PFS and OS of the K-ras wide type patients treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens chemotherapy were not significantly different from those with FOLFIRI regimen chemotherapy (P=0.900; P=0.802; P=0.738; P=0.904). Conclusion Oxaliplatin-based regimens as the first-line chemotherapy is more beneficial than FOLFIRI regimen as the first-line chemotherapy for K-ras mutant stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer patients; however, the efficacy and prognosis of K-ras wild type stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer patients were not significantly different between oxaliplatin-based regimens and FOLFIRI regimen chemotherapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回