高级搜索
螺旋断层和静态调强放疗治疗多发脑转移瘤的剂量分布差异[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2014, 41(08): 912-915. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.08.012
引用本文: 螺旋断层和静态调强放疗治疗多发脑转移瘤的剂量分布差异[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2014, 41(08): 912-915. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.08.012
Dose Distribution Differences of IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy for Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2014, 41(08): 912-915. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.08.012
Citation: Dose Distribution Differences of IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy for Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2014, 41(08): 912-915. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2014.08.012

螺旋断层和静态调强放疗治疗多发脑转移瘤的剂量分布差异

Dose Distribution Differences of IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy for Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases

  • 摘要: 目的 分析多发脑转移瘤实施全脑放疗同步癌灶推量照射静态调强放疗(IMRT)和螺旋断层放疗(HT)两种计划的肿瘤和危及器官剂量分布差异。方法 6例多发脑转移瘤患者(病灶2~5个)采用全脑放疗同步癌灶推量照射技术,分别制定IMRT计划和HT计划,全脑处方剂量40 Gy/22 f,转移瘤同步推量照射55 Gy/22 f。配对比较两种计划中全脑、脑干、视神经受量的最大值及平均值,以及两种计划靶区的适形度和均匀性指数。结果 全脑、脑干平均剂量在IMRT计划和HT计划中分别为(44.97±3.2),(42.48±4.0)和(41.56±2.1),(40.87±2.2) Gy(P=0.02,P=0.04),脑干最大剂量分别为(44.95±4.4)和(42.35±3.2) Gy(P=0.02)。左、右视神经平均剂量和最大剂量在IMRT和HT计划中差异无统计学意义。HT计划中靶区PGTV、PTVwb的适形度指数分别为(0.98±0.014)和(0.96±0.03),优于IMRT 计划的(0.95±0.023)和(0.92±0.06)(P=0.02,P=0.02)。HT计划中靶区PGTV、PTVwb的均匀性指数分别为(1.06±0.048)和(1.14±0.02),优于IMRT计划的(1.11±0.045)和(1.22±0.03)(P=0.00,P=0.00)。结论 多发脑转移瘤接受全脑放疗同步推量照射,HT计划较IMRT计划靶区剂量分布的适形度和均匀性更好,脑干受照剂量降低。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze dose distribution differences of IMRT and helical tomotherapy(HT) plan for tumor and organs at risk in patients with multiple brain metastases receiving whole brain radiotherapy(WBRT) with simultaneous in-field boost(SIB). Methods Six patients with multiple brain metastases (2 to 5 lesions) underwent WBRT(40 Gy/22 f ) with SIB(55 Gy/22 f ) in HT and IMRT plan respectively. Pair comparison was used to analyze maximum and mean doses of whole brain, brainstem and optic nerve, homogeneity and conformity indices of PGTV and PTVwb in HT and IMRT plan. Results In IMRT and HT plan, mean doses of whole brain, brainstem were (44.97±3.2),(42.48±4.0) and (41.56±2.1),(40.87±2.2) Gy(P=0.02,P=0.04), respectively; Brainstem Dmax was (44.95±4.4) and (42.35±3.2) Gy(P=0.02), respectively; Mean and maximum doses of left and right optic nerves were with no significant difference; Conformity indices of PGTV, PTVwb in IMRT and HT were (0.95 ± 0.023), (0.92±0.06) and (0.98±0.014), (0.96±0.03) respectively(P=0.02,P =0.02); Homogeneity indices of PGTV, PTVwb in IMRT and HT were (1.11±0.045), (1.22±0.03) and (1.06±0.048), (1.14±0.02) respectively(P=0.00,P=0.00). Conclusion Homogeneity and conformity of doses distribution in PGTV and PTVwb were better and brainstem radiation dose was lower in HT plan than those in IMRT in patients with multiple brain metastases receiving WBRT with SIB.

     

/

返回文章
返回