高级搜索
替吉奥单药治疗老年晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效与安全性[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2013, 40(05): 481-484. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.05.017
引用本文: 替吉奥单药治疗老年晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效与安全性[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2013, 40(05): 481-484. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.05.017
Efficacy and Safety of S-1 as Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2013, 40(05): 481-484. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.05.017
Citation: Efficacy and Safety of S-1 as Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2013, 40(05): 481-484. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2013.05.017

替吉奥单药治疗老年晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效与安全性

Efficacy and Safety of S-1 as Monotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 观察替吉奥单药治疗老年晚期乳腺癌的疗效与安全性。方法 回顾性分析老年晚期乳腺癌患者65例,研究组32例(S组):替吉奥 40~60 mg(<1.25 m2,40 mg; 1.25~1.5 m2,50 mg;>1.5 m2,60 mg),于早、晚饭后口服,连服14天,21天重复。对照组33例(X组):卡培他滨每日2000 mg/m2,分2次,连服14天,21天重复,至少2周期后评价疗效。结果 65例患者均可评价疗效, S组、X组有效率(RR)分别为31.3%(10/32)、27.3%(9/33),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为78.1%(25/32)、69.7%(23/33),中位疾病进展时间(TTP)分别为7.5、7.0月,中位总生存时间(OS)分别为17.3、15.2月,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组与对照组常见的不良反应为骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应、口角炎、乏力,多见Ⅰ~Ⅱ度,可耐受,两组差异无统计学意义;对照组手足综合征明显高于研究组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。 结论 替吉奥单药治疗老年乳腺癌疗效肯定,耐受性好于卡培他滨,值得临床进一步研究、推广。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods Retrospectively analysis sixty-five elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. The study group(S group,n=32):S-1:40-60 mg(<1.25 m2,40 mg; 1.25-1.5 m2,50 mg;>1.5 m2,60 mg, twice/day, oral administration,d1-d14, three weeks was a cycle. The control group(X group,n=33): Capecitabine :2 000 mg/(m2·d), separated to twice, d1-d14, three weeks was a cycle.The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated by WHO standards after 2-cycle treatment.Results The efficacy and toxicity could be evaluated in the all 65 patients,the RR of S group and X group was 31.3%(10/32),27.3%(9/33),the DCR was 78.1%(25/32),69.7%(23/33), the median TTP was 7.5 ,7.0 months, the OS was 17.3,15.2 months . There was no significant difference(P>0.05).The most common toxicities of the two groups were hematological,digestive toxic reactions, stomatitis and feeble,mainly 1-2 degree,and could be well tolerated.The Hand-foot syndrome rate of X group exceeded the S group(P=0.000). Conclusion The efficacy of S-1 for elderly patients with advanced breast cancer is significant with well- tolerated toxicity better than Capecitabine,and worth to further study and popularize.

     

/

返回文章
返回