高级搜索
骨转移癌患者血清PⅠCP、ⅠCTP检测的意义[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2010, 37(08): 902-904. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.08.012
引用本文: 骨转移癌患者血清PⅠCP、ⅠCTP检测的意义[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2010, 37(08): 902-904. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.08.012
Application of Determination of Serum PⅠCP and ⅠCTP Contents in Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2010, 37(08): 902-904. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.08.012
Citation: Application of Determination of Serum PⅠCP and ⅠCTP Contents in Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2010, 37(08): 902-904. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.08.012

骨转移癌患者血清PⅠCP、ⅠCTP检测的意义

Application of Determination of Serum PⅠCP and ⅠCTP Contents in Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases

  • 摘要: 目的: 探讨骨转移癌患者血清PⅠCP、ⅠCTP检测的临床意义。方法:依据骨显像和其他影像手段将80例恶性肿瘤患者分为无骨转移组(对照组)39例和骨转移组41例,采用 Soloway 分级标准,将骨转移组患者再分为三个亚组:A组 骨转移灶<6个20例,B组 骨转移灶6~20个12 例, C组 骨转移灶>20个或超级显像9例。所有患者空腹抽取静脉血,采用酶联免疫检测法(ELISA)测定Ⅰ型前胶原羧基端前肽(PⅠCP)、Ⅰ型胶原羧基端肽(ⅠCTP)的数值。分析血清PⅠCP、ⅠCTP水平在各级骨转移组间的变化,判断PⅠCP、ⅠCTP与骨转移程度之间的相关性。结果:(1)骨转移癌患者血清PⅠCP、ⅠCTP水平较对照组升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01 );(2) A、B、C三组血清PⅠCP水平依次递增,组与组之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);血清ⅠCTP水平在A、B、C三组总体有依次递增趋势,C组与A、B两组差异有统计学意义 (P<0.01)。(3)血清PⅠCP水平与骨转移灶数目相关性较高,相关系数为0.5320(P<0.01);ⅠCTP水平与骨转移灶数目有一定相关性,相关系数为0.4011(P<0.05)。结论:(1)血清PⅠCP、ⅠCTP水平的检测都能反映骨转移患者的病情变化,其中血清PⅠCP水平的检测临床价值较高;(2)血清PⅠCP水平与骨转移数目的相关性较高。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To study the clinical value of determination of serum procollagen Ⅰ carboxy-terminal propeptide (PⅠCP) and carboxyterminal telopeptide of type Ⅰ collagen(ⅠCTP) contents in cancer patients with bone metastases. Methods :Serum PⅠCP and ⅠCTP contents were measured with ELISA in 41 patients with bone metastases and 39 controls without bone metastases. The patients with bone metastases consisted of :(1) group A, less than 6 metastases foci, n=20 (2) group B, 6~20 foci, n=12 (3) group C, over 20 foci, n=9. The comparison of bone turnovers among patients with different bone loads was analyzed. Results :(1) Serum PⅠCP,ⅠCTP contents was significantly greater in patients with bone metastases than without bone metastases(P<0.01) (2) With the increase of the extent of bone metastases, serum PⅠCP elevated, there were significant difference among each grade(P<0.01). ⅠCTP elevated, there were significant difference between Group C and Group A,B(P<0.01). (3) Levels of PⅠCP (P<0.01) and ⅠCTP(P<0.05) were correlated with the number of foci. Conclusion : (1) The determinations of serum PⅠCP and ⅠCTP could reflect the clinical status of metastases size (PⅠCP more sensitive). (2) Levels of PⅠCP correlated well to the number of foci.

     

/

返回文章
返回