高级搜索
结直肠癌血清纤维蛋白原和炎性介质、肿瘤标志物的术前诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2010, 37(05): 566-569. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.05.021
引用本文: 结直肠癌血清纤维蛋白原和炎性介质、肿瘤标志物的术前诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2010, 37(05): 566-569. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.05.021
Values for Preoperative Staging ofFibrinogen,Inflammatory MediatorsandTumor Markers in Colorectal Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2010, 37(05): 566-569. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.05.021
Citation: Values for Preoperative Staging ofFibrinogen,Inflammatory MediatorsandTumor Markers in Colorectal Cancer[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2010, 37(05): 566-569. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2010.05.021

结直肠癌血清纤维蛋白原和炎性介质、肿瘤标志物的术前诊断价值

Values for Preoperative Staging ofFibrinogen,Inflammatory MediatorsandTumor Markers in Colorectal Cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨纤维蛋白原FIB、炎性介质(CRP、SAA)和肿瘤标志物(CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4)在术前评估结直肠癌分期的价值。 方法 178例经病理诊断为结直肠癌的患者,均于术前3天测定FIB、CRP、SAA、CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4 的水平,并与术后病理分期相比较。 结果 FIB与CRP、SAA、CEA和CA19-9的相关性有统计学意义,相关系数分别为0.600( P =0.000)、0.547( P=0.000)、0.168( P =0.025)、0.231( P =0.002)。FIB( P =0.000)、CRP( P =0.004)、SAA( P =0.046)、CEA( P =0.001)、CA19-9( P =0.000)和CA724( P =0.040)的值在不同的TNM分期之间差异有统计学意义。 建立诊断转移性结直肠癌的ROC曲线,FIB的ROC曲线下面积AZ=0.728( P =0.000),CRP的AZ=0.646( P =0.001),SAA的AZ=0.658( P =0.042),CA19-9的AZ=0.665( P =0.000),CA72-4的AZ=0.586( P =0.049)有统计学意义;当取FIB=3.715g/L为分界点时,FIB诊断转移性结直肠癌的敏感度为65.8%,特异性为66.6%,准确性为66.3%。 结论 FIB、炎性介质和肿瘤标志物有相关性,运用FIB术前评估有淋巴结转移的结直肠癌患者有潜在应用价值。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the value for preoperative assessment of serum fibrinogen (FIB), inflammatory mediators(C-reactive protein, CRP; serum amyloid A protein, SAA)and tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4) in colorectal cancer. Methods One hundred and Seventy-eight patientswith colorectal cancer were recruited. The data were pooled to analyze the relationship between the levels of serum FIB, CRP, SAA, CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 measured preoperatively and compared with postoperativepathological stages postoperative. Results There were statistical differences of correlations between levels of FIB and CRP, SAA, CEA, CA19-9, of which the correlation coefficients were 0.600, 0.547, 0.168and0.231, respectively. The levels of FIB ( P =0.000), CRP( P =0.004), SAA( P =0.046), CEA( P =0.001), CA19-9( P =0.000) and CA72-4( P =0.040) were significant difference in TNM stages. Contriving the ROC curve for metastatic colorectal cancer, the area under curve of FIB (AZ=0.728), CRP(AZ=0.646), SAA (AZ=0.658), CA19-9 (AZ=0.665)and CA72-4(AZ=0.586) also hadstatistical significance, of which theP values were 0.000, 0.001, 0.042, 0.000and 0.049, respectively. While the critical point of FIB was defined as 3.715g/L, the accuracy, sensitivityand specificity ofthe prediction to metastatic colorectal cancer were 65.84%, 66.6%,66.3%,respectively. Conclusion Therelationships between FIB, inflammatory mediators and tumor markers were observed. Using FIB to evaluate colorectal patients with lymphatic metastasis preoperatively has potentially clinical value.

     

/

返回文章
返回