高级搜索

恶性肿瘤家族史与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征的关系

曹欣华, 韩丽飞, 吕建鑫, 胡浩霖, 张亚男

曹欣华, 韩丽飞, 吕建鑫, 胡浩霖, 张亚男. 恶性肿瘤家族史与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征的关系[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(10): 752-755. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.20.0027
引用本文: 曹欣华, 韩丽飞, 吕建鑫, 胡浩霖, 张亚男. 恶性肿瘤家族史与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征的关系[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(10): 752-755. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.20.0027
CAO Xinhua, HAN Lifei, LYU Jianxin, HU Haolin, ZHANG Ya'nan. Association Between Family History of Malignant Neoplasms and Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(10): 752-755. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.20.0027
Citation: CAO Xinhua, HAN Lifei, LYU Jianxin, HU Haolin, ZHANG Ya'nan. Association Between Family History of Malignant Neoplasms and Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer Patients[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(10): 752-755. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.20.0027

恶性肿瘤家族史与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征的关系

详细信息
    作者简介:

    曹欣华(1992-),女,硕士,住院医师,从事乳腺肿瘤的诊断和综合治疗

    通信作者:

    张亚男(1963-),女,硕士,主任医师,从事乳腺肿瘤的诊断和综合治疗,E-mail: zhangyanan79@126.com

  • 中图分类号: R737.9

Association Between Family History of Malignant Neoplasms and Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer Patients

More Information
  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨恶性肿瘤家族史(MN-FH)与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征之间的关系。

    方法 

    回顾性分析东南大学附属中大医院2016年1月—2018年12月收治的417例乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料,根据有无MN-FH分成两组。采用χ2检验分析两组患者临床病理特征之间的关系。

    结果 

    417例乳腺癌患者中,有MN-FH者67例(16.1%)。有MN-FH组的患者有更高比例的脉管癌栓(P=0.046)和淋巴结转移(P=0.023),肿瘤更易表现为ER阴性(P=0.025)、PR阴性(P=0.031)和HER2阳性(P=0.041)。进一步亚组分析发现,有乳腺癌家族史的患者较无MN-FH的患者有更晚的肿瘤分期(P=0.011),肿瘤更易表现为三阴性和HER2扩增型(P=0.010)。其他恶性肿瘤家族史的患者较无MN-FH的患者有更高比例的脉管癌栓(P=0.036)和淋巴结转移(P=0.034)。

    结论 

    有MN-FH的乳腺癌患者肿瘤恶性程度更高,对于有MN-FH的人群体检非常重要。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To investigate the association between family history of malignant neoplasms (MN-FH) and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with breast cancer.

    Methods 

    We analyzed retrospectively the clinical data of 417 breast cancer patients in Zhong Da Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients were grouped based on MN-FH or non-MN-FH. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were analyzed by χ2 test.

    Results 

    Among 417 breast cancer patients, 67(16.1%) cases had MN-FH. Compared with non-MN-FH group, MN-FH group had higher proportion of vascular thrombosis (P=0.046), lymph node metastasis (P=0.023), ER negative (P=0.025), PR negative (P=0.031) and HER2 positive (P=0.041). In the further subgroup analysis, compared with non-MN-FH patients, patients with breast cancer history had higher tumor stage (P=0.011) and the tumors were more likely to be triple-negative and HER2-positive (P=0.010). Breast cancer patients with family history of other malignant tumors had higher proportion of vascular thrombosis (P=0.036) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.034).

    Conclusion 

    Breast cancer patients with MN-FH have higher degree than non-MN-FH patients. For people with MN-FH, physical examination is very important.

     

  • Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
    作者贡献
    曹欣华:数据收集、数据分析、论文撰写
    韩丽飞:数据收集
    吕建鑫:论文修改
    胡浩霖、张亚男:论文审阅
  • 表  1   有无MN-FH的乳腺癌患者一般临床特征比较

    Table  1   Comparison of clinicopathological features between breast cancer patients with or without MN-FH

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   MN-FH与乳腺癌患者临床病理特征的关系

    Table  2   Relation between MN-FH and clinicopathological features of breast cancer patients

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019, 69(1): 7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551

    [2]

    Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58, 209 women with breast cancer and 101, 986 women without the disease[J]. Lancet, 2001, 358(9291): 1389-1399. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06524-2

    [3]

    Yoenny PG, Maikel MG, Diamela AC, et al. Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in the Female Population[J]. Finlay, 2017, 7(4): 283-289.

    [4]

    Chikman B, Davidson T, Kais H, et al. Is there an association between invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and a family history of gastric cancer?[J]. Fam Cancer, 2016, 15(4): 41-47. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26358115

    [5]

    Arpino G, Pensabene M, Condello C, et al. Tumor characteristics and prognosis in familial breast cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2016, 16(1): 924-932. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2962-1

    [6]

    Suat B, Cihad T. Predictive factors affecting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer[J]. Haseki Tip Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki, 2019, 57(4): 356-361. doi: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2019.4983

    [7]

    Zhao Y, Wang X, Huang Y, et al. Conversion of immunohisto-chemical markers conversion and breast density is associated with pathological response and prognosis in very young breast cancer patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 5677-5690. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S198844

    [8]

    Sobočan M, Turk M, Čater P, et al. Clinical features and their effect on outcomes of patients with triple negative breast cancer with or without lymph node involvement[J]. J Int Med Res, 2019, 11: 300060519887259. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/337891292_Clinical_features_and_their_effect_on_outcomes_of_patients_with_triple_negative_breast_cancer_with_or_without_lymph_node_involvement

    [9]

    Gujam FJ, Going JJ, Edwards J, et al. The role of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in predicting survival and methods of detection in patients with primary operable breast cancer[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hemat, 2014, 89(2): 231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.08.014

    [10] 陈晓芬.家族性乳腺癌的临床病理特征及BRCA1/2突变的初步探讨[D].广州医科大学, 2018.

    Chen XF. The clinicopathologic characteristic and BRCA1/2 mutation in familial breast cancer[D]. Guangzhou Medical University, 2018.

    [11]

    Barnard ME, Boeke CE, Tamimi RM. Established breast cancer risk factors and risk of intrinsic tumor subtypes[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015, 1856(1): 73-85.

    [12] 王璟, 芦文丽, 王媛, 等.中国女性肿瘤家族史与乳腺癌发病风险关系的meta分析[J].中国妇幼保健, 2012, 27(7): 1105-1109. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZFYB201207068.htm

    Wang J, Lu WL, Wang Y, et al. Meta-analysis on the relationship between family history of tumor and the risk of breast cancer among Chinese Women[J]. Zhongguo Fu You Bao Jian, 2012, 27(7): 1105-1109. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZFYB201207068.htm

    [13] 邓伟伟, 吴军, 霍怡杉, 等. BRCA基因突变对乳腺癌预后影响的meta分析[J].国际检验医学杂志, 2019, 40(17): 2058-2065. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GWSQ201917003.htm

    Deng WW, Wu J, Huo YS, et al. BRCA gene mutation and its prognostic implication in breast carcinoma:a meta-analysis[J]. Guo Ji Jian Yan Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2019, 40(17): 2058-2065. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GWSQ201917003.htm

    [14] 赵翠翠, 刘红.年轻乳腺癌的分子生物学发病机制[J].肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(3): 213-217. doi: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.1130

    Zhao CC, Liu H. Molecular biological pathogenesis of young breast cancer[J]. Zhong Liu Fang Zhi Yan Jiu, 2020, 47(3): 213-217. doi: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.1130

表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2190
  • HTML全文浏览量:  502
  • PDF下载量:  1029
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-01-12
  • 修回日期:  2020-04-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-01-12
  • 刊出日期:  2020-10-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭