高级搜索

白蛋白矫正阴离子间隙预测晚期肺癌免疫治疗预后的临床价值:一项回顾性队列研究

Clinical value of albumin-corrected anion gap in predicting prognosis of advanced lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

  • 摘要: 【摘要】目的:本研究旨在探讨白蛋白矫正阴离子间隙(ACAG)在晚期肺癌患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗中的预后价值。方法:选取2019年1月至2024年10月在两家医疗中心接受ICIs治疗的晚期肺癌患者637例。收集患者基线临床资料及实验室检查指标,并计算ACAG。使用X-Tile软件确定ACAG的最佳预后临界值(11.58mmol/L),将患者分为ACAG低值组(≤11.58mmol/L)与高值组(>11.58 mmol/L)。主要研究终点为总生存期(OS),次要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。为控制混杂因素,对两组患者进行倾向性评分匹配。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,使用Cox比例风险回归模型分析预后影响因素,并进行了亚组分析。结果:共纳入637例患者,匹配后队列为440例。多因素Cox分析显示,在调整了临床及实验室指标后,ACAG>11.58mmol/L是OS的独立危险因素(HR=1.74,95%CI:1.02-2.98,P=0.044),但并非PFS的独立预测因子。分层分析进一步证实,ACAG>11.58 mmol/L在不同程度的协变量调整后均与OS缩短显著相关。生存曲线显示,高ACAG组中位OS(47.0个月)显著低于低ACAG组。亚组分析表明,ACAG对OS的不良预测价值在男性、年龄<65岁及肺鳞癌患者中更为显著。结论:在接受ICIs治疗的晚期肺癌患者中,较高的基线ACAG水平(>11.58mmol/L)是OS缩短的独立危险因素,但其与PFS无显著关联。ACAG或可作为一个简便、有效的生物学指标,用于评估晚期肺癌患者免疫治疗的总生存预后。
     

     

    Abstract: Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of the albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) in advanced lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: A total of 637 patients with advanced lung cancer who received ICIs treatment at two medical centers between January 2019 and October 2024 were enrolled. Baseline clinical data and laboratory parameters were collected, and the ACAG was calculated. The optimal prognostic cut-off value for ACAG (11.58 mmol/L) was determined using X-Tile software, and patients were divided into a low ACAG group (≤11.58 mmol/L) and a high ACAG group (>11.58 mmol/L). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Propensity score matching was performed to control for confounding factors. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors, and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 637 patients were included, and 440 patients remained in the matched cohort. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that after adjusting for clinical and laboratory parameters, ACAG >11.58 mmol/L was an independent risk factor for OS (HR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.02-2.98, P=0.044), but not an independent predictor for PFS. Stratified analysis further confirmed that ACAG >11.58 mmol/L was consistently associated with significantly shorter OS after adjusting for different sets of covariates. Survival curves demonstrated that the median OS in the high ACAG group (47.0 months) was significantly lower than that in the low ACAG group. Subgroup analysis indicated that the adverse predictive value of ACAG for OS was more pronounced in males, patients aged <65 years, and those with squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusion: In advanced lung cancer patients treated with ICIs, a higher baseline ACAG level (>11.58 mmol/L) is an independent risk factor for shorter OS, but it is not significantly associated with PFS. ACAG may serve as a simple and effective biological marker for assessing overall survival prognosis in advanced lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回